FAQ What you're probably wonderingFAQWhat you're probably wondering

Three core differences: ① Capacity — you're not buying hours, you're buying "one senior developer + their tuned AI workflow (code gen, docs, testing, ops)" as a unit. One person delivers what a small team used to, hence 'one dev equals a team.' ② Communication — you talk directly to the person writing the code, no PM or sales layer in between. ③ Risk — weekly delivery, cycle-based billing, stop anytime. No 6-month contracts, no penalty clauses. That's the lightweight outsourcing model.

Three layers of safety: (1) Weekly delivery, real output not Gantt charts; (2) Direct one-on-one, you see code and decisions; (3) Pay-per-cycle — any unhappy week, the next cycle is cancelled with zero penalty.

All yours — code, docs, AI prompts, fine-tuned model weights. The contract spells out IP ownership and confidentiality, meeting enterprise compliance standards.

The same developer can seamlessly continue into iteration or maintenance — no re-onboarding. If you want to switch, work history (code, docs, decisions) is portable. No vendor lock-in.

Yes — this is one of our strongest scenarios. AI toolchains excel at understanding old code, auto-generating docs, and doing incremental refactors. One developer with AI can safely migrate a core module from legacy to modern stack in weeks — transparent process, controllable risk, more efficient and cheaper than assembling an outsourcing team.

We're inviting the first wave of enterprises now. Drop your email — we'll reach out within a week to scope your needs. Early partners get 50% off the first cycle, plus the first 20 get a free iteration cycle.